Charles
M. Blow’s Library visit, then held at gunpoint?
Charles Blow’s article titled “Library
Visit, Then Held at Gunpoint?” published in the New York Times Stood out to
me because the way Charles Blow portrays his son intrigues me. Charles Blow
portrays his son, who is a Yale student, as an above average student. He starts
off by telling us that it’s Saturday evening and his son is at the library.
Then he moves on to tell you that since his son was at the library he might as
well put in a request for some multimedia equipment he will need for a future
project. The way Charles Blow’s language changes throughout the article is a
representation of how professional writers will use a certain type of word and change
it to something else in the passage. For example in Charles Bow’s article the
title says “held at gunpoint”, in the subheading he uses the word “detained”,
later in the passage he states that his son was “accosted” by a campus police. Charles
Blow states that later in the article that "this is the scenario he has
always dreaded". Even though Charles Blow has prepared his son for moments like
being held at gunpoint. You can’t prepare yourself for the anxiety and stress
that situation like this can cause. I believe the strength of Charles Blow’s
article is the fact that he is a father who is proud of his son and prepared
his son for situations like that. I also believe that Charles Blow is appalling
to the fathers of the world with this article.
I would recommend
this article to someone who is thinking about going to a library on Saturday
night. I would also recommend this article to someone who finds that reading
suspenseful articles is a pleasurable way to pass the time along.
Adam, Hold up. You're a bit all over the place. First, you're intrigued by the way Blow presents his son to readers - all that library on a Saturday night business. Then you're intrigued by the way his words change. Next you're coo-koo for Cocoa Puffs over Blow's son's preparedness for a gun fight. Well, which is it? Or are you intrigued by all of these things? It's fine if you are, you just need to let us know early on that "Hey, several things in Charles Blow's article caught my attention." Also, you might want to look at the difference between appealing and appalling. Cheers.
ReplyDeleteAdam, you're writing seems sufficient and very intriguing, but you seems to be intrigued by a lot of things, but over all it was a good.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey Adam, valid points but i felt like after quoting Blow you were going to go into detail or support what he was saying with your own opinion but you gave quote after quote. After reading this i didn't really take away how you felt or why you chose this article.
ReplyDelete